House Passes Democrats’ Police Reform Bill That Seeks Radical Change https://t.co/MLvA84H8r9
— Manthony (@Manthon85003760) June 27, 2020
Saturday, June 27, 2020
House Passes Democrats' Police Reform Bill That Seeks Radical Change
QAnon: “Guardian Pushes a Hit Piece on Qanon/Facebook a Day After Q’s Epic Digital Battleground Drop” — June 18th to 25th 2020 (4496 to 4528)
QAnon: “Guardian Pushes a Hit Piece on Qanon/Facebook a Day After Q’s Epic Digital Battleground Drop” — June 18th to 25th 2020 (4496 to 4528) https://t.co/uaNLN5yuqe
— Manthony (@Manthon85003760) June 27, 2020
New Field Hospital in NYC, cost $21 million, closed, never saw ONE patient
$21 Million NY Field Hospital Closes After Never Seeing a Patient https://t.co/DWtFXdx1tb via @BreitbartNews
— Manthony (@Manthon85003760) June 27, 2020
The United States is a Corporation
The Act of 1871: The “United States” Is a Corporation – There are Two Constitutions – Federal Jack https://t.co/RNQikGnDvU via @DTRH_Popeye— Manthony (@Manthon85003760) June 27, 2020
By Anna Von Reitz
The Act of 1871 -- A Correct Analysis by Team Law By Anna Von Reitz With all the hub-bub about The Act of 1871 circulating in the patriot community, I felt it was time to re-publish (for about the tenth time) the actual breakdown of what happened to The Act of 1871 after its initial repeal in 1874 ----- and to publish again the correct analysis of it all by Team Law, which was finished some years ago: 1871 - Act of 1871 ---“An Act to provide a Government for the District of Columbia,” ch. 62, 16 Stat. 419, February 21, 1871 ---which was repealed in 1874 and then passed piecemeal via these actions---- “An Act Providing a Permanent Form of Government for the District of Columbia,” ch. 180, sec. 1, 20 Stat. 102, June 11, 1878, to remain and continue as a municipal corporation (brought forward from the Act of 1871, as provided in the Act of March 2, 1877, amended and approved March 9, 1878, Revised Statutes of the United States Relating to the District of Columbia . . . 1873–’74 (in force as of December 1, 1873), sec. 2, p. 2); as amended by the Act of June 28, 1935, 49 Stat. 430, ch. 332, sec. 1 (Title 1, Section 102, District of Columbia Code (1940)). When looking at the intent of all this, given that the actual District of Columbia was set up in 1790 and fully chartered by 1801, the aim of the Act of 1871 is, it appears, merely to set up “U.S. Corp”--- “That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the “District of Columbia”, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes … and exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation.” – Act of 1871 verbiage--- So the Act of 1871 was to create a private corporation owned by the actual government of the District of Columbia--- the infamous District of Columbia Municipal Corporation: “Further, the only government created in that Act was the same form of private government any private corporation has within the operation of its own corporate construct....... U.S. Corp is not merely an incorporated municipality (District of Columbia); rather, it is a private corporation (District of Columbia Municipal Corporation) that was lawfully created by our original jurisdiction government.” ---- Team Law analysis. ---------------------------- See this article and over 1800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
What the President can and can not do
Analysis | Under the Insurrection Act of 1807, here’s what a U.S. president can and cannot do https://t.co/j3VxQC80dl
— Manthony (@Manthon85003760) June 27, 2020
Stop the online conspiracy theorists before they break democracy
https://t.co/2gHQn2IY9W
— Manthony (@Manthon85003760) June 27, 2020
Worth remember - Feb 2019https://t.co/QolacUFaMk
"The scale this generates is disproportional enough to distort public perception: In 2018, ...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)